For the match Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton on February 11, 2026 (Premier League), our Metapred algorithm predicts a Nottingham Forest home victory with very high confidence. Our analysis suggests only one team will find the net, Our algorithm expects under 2.5 goals. Average odds suggest a strong probability of a Nottingham Forest victory (1.70).
Goals
⚽Nottingham Forest scored in 4 of their last 5 matches
Defense
🛡️Only 27% of Nottingham Forest home matches saw both teams score
🧤Nottingham Forest kept 6 clean sheets in 15 home matches
According to the MetaPred algorithm, the most likely outcome for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton is a Nottingham Forest win with a probability of 81%.
Our analysis indicates No for Both Teams to Score (BTTS) with a 69% probability for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton.
The MetaPred model predicts Under 2.5 goals for the Over/Under 2.5 goals market with a 70% probability.
MetaPred is ranked #2 out of 9 prediction providers with a 52.5% accuracy rate across all markets. See our full provider comparison for details.
For the match Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton on February 11, 2026 (Premier League), our Metapred algorithm predicts a Nottingham Forest home victory with very high confidence. Our analysis suggests only one team will find the net, Our algorithm expects under 2.5 goals. Average odds suggest a strong probability of a Nottingham Forest victory (1.70).
Goals
⚽Nottingham Forest scored in 4 of their last 5 matches
Defense
🛡️Only 27% of Nottingham Forest home matches saw both teams score
🧤Nottingham Forest kept 6 clean sheets in 15 home matches
According to the MetaPred algorithm, the most likely outcome for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton is a Nottingham Forest win with a probability of 81%.
Our analysis indicates No for Both Teams to Score (BTTS) with a 69% probability for Nottingham Forest vs Wolverhampton.
The MetaPred model predicts Under 2.5 goals for the Over/Under 2.5 goals market with a 70% probability.
MetaPred is ranked #2 out of 9 prediction providers with a 52.5% accuracy rate across all markets. See our full provider comparison for details.
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 17 | 5 | 3 | +32 | 56 | |
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arsenal | 25 | 17 | 5 | 3 | +32 | 56 |
| 2 | Manchester City | 25 | 15 | 5 | 5 | +27 | 50 |
| 3 | 25 | 14 | 5 | 6 | +9 | 47 | |
| 4 | 26 | 12 | 9 | 5 | +10 | 45 | |
| 5 | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | +17 | 44 | |
| 6 | 25 | 11 | 6 | 8 | +5 | 39 | |
| 7 | 25 | 12 | 3 | 10 | +5 | 39 | |
| 8 | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 | -1 | 37 | |
| 9 | 26 | 9 | 10 | 7 | -2 | 37 | |
| 10 | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 36 | |
| 11 | 25 | 9 | 9 | 7 | -2 | 36 | |
| 12 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | -2 | 34 | |
| 13 | 25 | 8 | 8 | 9 | -3 | 32 | |
| 14 | 25 | 7 | 10 | 8 | +1 | 31 | |
| 15 | 26 | 7 | 9 | 10 | -9 | 30 | |
| 16 | 26 | 7 | 8 | 11 | -1 | 29 | |
| 17 | 25 | 7 | 5 | 13 | -13 | 26 | |
| 18 | 26 | 6 | 6 | 14 | -17 | 24 | |
| 19 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 16 | -24 | 15 | |
| 20 | 25 | 1 | 5 | 19 | -32 | 8 |
| 2 |
| Manchester City |
| 25 |
| 15 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| +27 |
| 50 |
| 3 | Aston Villa | 25 | 14 | 5 | 6 | +9 | 47 |
| 4 | Manchester United | 26 | 12 | 9 | 5 | +10 | 45 |
| 5 | Chelsea | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | +17 | 44 |
| 6 | Liverpool | 25 | 11 | 6 | 8 | +5 | 39 |
| 7 | Brentford | 25 | 12 | 3 | 10 | +5 | 39 |
| 8 | Everton | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 | -1 | 37 |
| 9 | Bournemouth | 26 | 9 | 10 | 7 | -2 | 37 |
| 10 | Newcastle United | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 36 |
| 11 | Sunderland | 25 | 9 | 9 | 7 | -2 | 36 |
| 12 | Fulham | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | -2 | 34 |
| 13 | Crystal Palace | 25 | 8 | 8 | 9 | -3 | 32 |
| 14 | Brighton | 25 | 7 | 10 | 8 | +1 | 31 |
| 15 | Leeds United | 26 | 7 | 9 | 10 | -9 | 30 |
| 16 | Tottenham | 26 | 7 | 8 | 11 | -1 | 29 |
| 17 | Nottingham Forest | 25 | 7 | 5 | 13 | -13 | 26 |
| 18 | West Ham | 26 | 6 | 6 | 14 | -17 | 24 |
| 19 | Burnley | 25 | 3 | 6 | 16 | -24 | 15 |
| 20 | Wolverhampton | 25 | 1 | 5 | 19 | -32 | 8 |
